No way!!

Disclaimer:

  • If you haven’t watched Highway, please go ahead and watch it.
  • If you have watched Highway, go ahead and read the blog.
  • If you like Jackie Shroff, you’re cool.

highway-movie-still-15

Right from the trailers, there was no doubt what Highway would be about. Stockholm Syndrome, the scenario when a hostage falls in love with his/her kidnapper.

So clearly, it was just a case of how, and not what.

Highway is a difficult film to ease into. The first ten minutes are montage shots of a truck going through different terrains, and a marriage video where women are selecting sarees for the wedding.

And then, the girl gets kidnapped, and taken hostage.

Journeys have been a leit-motif of Imtiaz Ali films. Jab We Met was about a couple who discover their love for each other over two journeys. Love Aaj Kal spoke about the journeys we need to embark on, for love, illustrated through parallel stories from two generations. And Socha Na Tha was…err…the beginning of Abhay Deol’s journey in cinema.

Now, this is where the problems in the film begin. The girl is kidnapped, and suddenly, she realises that she’s actually enjoying it. Enjoying the grandeur of nature, the open spaces, open air and the smiling sun, and other such first world luxuries.

She’s been manhandled, felt up, gagged, made to sleep in a dumpyard, and yet when she wakes up, she starts talking animatedly.

Here, as a viewer you are wondering: ‘What’s wrong with her? Why is she talking so much?’

Just then, Alia Bhat stops and thinks aloud, ‘Hey, what’s wrong with me? Why am I talking so much?’

A few scenes later, the police are searching the truck, and instead of escaping, she chooses to hide inside the truck. At this juncture, you as a viewer are wondering, ‘Is she going mad? Why didn’t she escape?’

As if on cue, she thinks aloud, ‘Hey! Am I going mad? Why didn’t I escape?’

But in true Bollywood style, these are minor hiccups. As we all know, when lauvv has to happen, lauvv will happen.

And so when the trucker tells her that his mother used to sing him songs as a kid, she tells him, ‘Tum mujhe kaafi cute lagne lage ho.’ To put this in perspective, it is like Scarlett Johansson sending me a friend’s request, and then commenting ‘Oooh, so sexy you are. Proud to be your friend, ya!’ on my pictures.

*

As befuddled as the viewer, is the poor trucker. Randeep Hooda, playing an intense and brooding man for the absolutely first time in his entire career, fails to understand what’s wrong with the girl.

[INSERT ERIC CLAPTON VIDEO: ‘COCAINE’]

 

The basic premise of the film is so contrived, it’s hard to empathise with the protagonist. In  today’s India, when how we treat women is such a large issue, when sparrows have gone extinct in Delhi in the presence of burly men, would a girl really be enjoy being kidnapped?

Not only does the heroine fall in love, she goes one up, and experiences what I like to call the ‘Bollywood Heroine Chhota Sa Ghar Complex’.

Whenever a rich girl in a Hindi film gets kidnapped, or stranded, she will want to have a small house, away from the rest of the world, just her and the hero – their small house of happiness. An adult version of the House-House game that kids play.

And so the two find a house, and start living in it. She cooks him Maggi, sweeps the house, and prepares a bed for the two of them. And then, shit hits the AC. So our trucker guy, who has killed three men, kidnaps women from roads, and carries a gun in his bag when he travels in a bus, refuses to go into the house. So transformed is the man, that he doesn’t want to make the sexay time with the girl.

I am sure this happens in the People’s Republic of Karan Johar, but in our world, it is simply too far-fetched to believe.

The point about her having a troubled past seems hollow. She could have spoken to her father. He is shown as a sensible, caring person, the only cruel thing he’s ever done is to give her an anaesthetic against her will.

Imtiaz Ali, slowly but surely, has become the King of Unexplained Angst.

In Love Aaj Kal, the hero is torn because the girl he loves (who also loves him back) is getting married to another man. He refuses to do anything about it, and then lands there a week after the marriage.

In Rockstar, our hero is angsty because he whisked away his lover, who was another man’s wife, to the Himalayas. In the Himalayas, he gets the terminally ill woman pregnant, and then is angry when she succumbs to the complications.

And in Highway, a kidnapping serves as a coming-of-age for the woman, who rebels against her life by choosing to live with her kidnapper, who hasn’t even acknowledged his love once, but has threatened to sell her to a brothel twice.

‘Is this love?’

‘Maine na jaana….chutiya banana….’

*

The other problem area for the film is Alia Bhat’s acting. Saddled with a role that requires an intense portrayal, Alia Bhat flares her nostrils so violently, it would make Hrithik Roshan run and hide behind a curtain.

And AR Rahman is barely used in the film. Most of the film consists of silent, long shots. When you have Rahman, why not use Rahman? It’s like having Tendulkar on your side, and opening the innings with Venkatpathy Raju.

If Socha Na Tha was a breath of fresh air, and Rockstar was a gust of angst, Highway is a farcical fart. A terribly disappointing film that sets an unrealistic premise in front of you, and doesn’t help you unravel it.

Watch Highway only if you can get high on the way. There are some shots of beautiful snow-capped peaks that you wouldn’t normally get to see on YouTube or National Geographic.

***

12 thoughts on “No way!!

  1. Socha Na Tha is one of my all-time favorites. So this is an Imtiaz fan saying, wow what a review!! After SOTY been dreading the next time Alia Bhatt crosses our screens, but people saying nice things about her and the movie. Hopefully it isn’t too bad. But in any case, this review made my day 😀

    Like

  2. And you my friend have gained a loyal follower! High Five for the Eric Clapton Video. Sure, you ain’t an ex-assistant of the Johar and Jawaharat camp, na? Just the finesse of cuing the song at the right time made me wonder.

    I can see how beautifully you highlight the flaws and still remain so grounded. Aankhon main aansoon aa gaye. Wah! Which is the next movie you gonna review. I might as well save my time, money and effort and just come and read here.

    BTW, used to be a part of Bollywood, not so long ago…………yes, you can stop laughing now.

    Like

  3. That was downright vicious, heartR. I am a big fan and i firmly believe girls should date Pot Smokers but with highway, here’s I think what you missed.

    The girl does not fall in love with the kidnapper. Nope. Never. As soon as she finds out he is harmless, she gets comfortable in his company. Its more about comfort than chemistry. She doesnt plan to live out there in the hills and make maggi every single day of her life for him. Nor about marriage. That is made quite clear in the film. The central idea is, as the wickedly wonderful Aalia Bhatt (in this fim) says, she doesnt want to go back, nor reach where he is taking him. But she likes the travel. Its not about her falling in love with him. She doesnt. Atleast not in the Karan Johar sense.

    As for Randeep Hooda’s character, you emasculated him man 😛 But I guess his character arc wasnt that under developed, nor that unbelievable. He secretly wanted to marry her and have kids and all that jazz as he says. And that’s how guys react when they have been living with wild chimpanzees and suddenly a female enters the scene. They want to keep it for themselves, for ever. And hence when he breaks down in the end, it made sense. It reminded him of better, saner times in his life. He shouts ‘amma’ not Veera while crying.

    So to cut the long harangue short, I think, and its only me, Highway was fantastic. It wasn’t about Karan Johar kind of puppy love, but an affection born out of comfort and mutual understanding. Yes granted, some sequences were a bit too sudden to be believed like her incessant yapping. But that’s a minor hiccup in what was otherwise a very different take on a relationship between two people, in the wilderness.

    Like

    1. I get your point about it not being the typical love story, but somehow it didn’t seem convincing enough for me. But again, it’s cinema we are talking about, so the both of us will receive and understand it in different ways.

      Even keeping my criticism apart, the film did feel a little sloppy at times. There were long vacant silences, and at some points, I felt a little fidgety in my seat. Also, you cannot discount my personal bias against love stories, due partly to all the romance we grew up watching.

      But it’s nice to differ. At least we’re not killing each other over it. Thanks for the comments! 🙂

      Like

      1. Ya. i guess its more to do with one’s own state of mind. True that. And I understand this movie wont work for many people. I, for one, loved those long silences, that said a lot. Just personal opinions ofcourse.

        Keep up the good work, your posts are fantastic, doesnt matter if we agree or differ. 😀

        Like

    2. Agree with you, and not Heartranjan coz I really liked the film. I think people who question the improbable relationship between the two are making a big mistake by assuming a Karan Johar type pop corn romance between them when it clearly isn’t the case.
      Anyway that part about flaring nostrils is true though 😀

      Like

  4. Loved reading the article. On your point of not using A R Rahman, Note that Resul Pookutty and A R Rahman are the same duo who won Oscars. Sound should be used in a minimalist approach unlike typical Bollywood movies. Too much of background score kills the feel ,its the foley which helps in recreating the feel onscreen.The movie no doubt has appropriate use of sound.

    Like

  5. Hriday bhai…
    I am a fan of your posts…
    But as nisheeth pandey and sampurna said…
    I think movie was woven around a quite beautiful concept…
    You might not have liked it, depends on one’s tastes and experiences in life…
    I wilk also say that star of the show was Mr. Hooda. What a charachter he played…Without saying much..
    The thing with issues like this is, u understand them by experience or by experience of some really close one…one may want to completely run away… Y not.. Sometimes the artificiality of this world wants you to.. With or without a Savior.. She gets one..she uses it…
    I mean who would have wanted to marry that gutless rat anyway..
    Alia might not have been to the mark though, i agree..
    This could have been made such a powerful role…

    N the thing with doll house was to show how much immature she was..to show that she was living in a dream…..she was still a child, 9 yrs old…
    With the molestation, she felt her whole childhood was lost…
    She was reliving it.. Afterall what she wanted ?? Freedom, dignity and respect(in words of a very near one who saw it with me)…this guy gave him all…didn’t touch her…
    And as they say is with beautiful places, breathtaking places…they make you fall in love with anyone….

    Like

  6. Hey Heartranjan,

    I am a big fan of Imtiaz Ali and I think he is very thoughtful with his creations. According to me, the female protagonist Veera Tripathi played by Alia Bhatt was suffering from Stockholm syndrome and that is why she she starts feeling safe with Mahabir Singh.
    If you wish to know more about Imtiaz Ali you can do that- https://www.xpert.chat/p/imtiaz-ali
    or you can try the Xpert App- https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=chat.xpert.user

    P.S. The Alia Bhatt flaring her nostrills part made me laugh.

    Like

Leave a comment