IPL 5 : Five things I am NOT going to miss

The guys tolerated Ganguly and Agarkar for three years, and SRK for 5 years. Truly deserved the title. Congrats, KKR !!

To begin with, I am not one of those who complain that IPL is ruining cricket and all that tripe. How do you know that cricket is being ruined? Is there a quality check that tells you how cricket is being ruined? If lots of money entering the sport is what ruins it, West Indies cricket should be the purest, right? How come brother Gayle is hanging out in India and butchering hapless Indian domestic bowlers for two years now?

So, let’s get this straight. There’s no ruining cricket. It’s like lamenting that Mario the video game was going extinct. Yeah, it was an awesome game and all that. But how long can you watch a man with a cap jumping on tortoises and collecting stars? People move on, and want different things. 

I find it funny how people like Harsha Bhogle write seemingly well-researched articles like ’5 cricketers to watch out for in the future’ on cricinfo. Let’s face it, in the five years that Lalit Modi stormed into our lives, only Ashwin and Jadeja are the players who have made any impact in the national cricket side. For most others, it is a two month extravaganza that you can’t avoid. For me, it gives me something to watch everyday on TV. And frankly, if I have to choose between soap operas and asinine films on Zee Cinema, I am happy with the IPL, thank you very much. 

This year’s IPL took things one step further. While we had fakeIPLplayer giving us fake insights into the happenings of the KKR dressing room a few years ago, this year proved that the guy was a Nostradomus of sorts. This year’s IPL saw sting operations about match fixing, rave parties with cricketers claiming they thought they were birthday parties, and molestation cases where Siddharth Mallya finally broke to the world the etiquette that a future wife needs to follow. What more can you want?

However, not everything was rosy. There were still a few niggling worries that bugged me throughout the season. 

 

1. Shastri and Gavaskar’s cliches: What will it take for the BCCI to realise that noone really listens to these guys anymore? Coming up with the choicest of cliches time and again, Shastri and Gavaskar have rubbed off some of their awesome predictability on their juniors – the extremely original Arun Lal, and the guy who makes marathon chess matches seem like 3D porn – Laxman Sivaramakrishnan. 

In all fairness, Gavaskar has seemed to mellow down quite a bit this season. But Shastri, how do you stop an idea whose time had come and gone 20 year ago? The man crusades on, with his ‘travelled like a bullet’ and ‘pin-drop silence in the crowd as Sachin departs’ references like there is no tomorrow.

 

2. Danny Morrison’s drug-induced howling: When Danny Morrison was brought into the commentary box a few years back, it was a breath of fresh air. He did not adhere to the Shastri dictum of two cliches an over, and seemed to bring in some sort of a humour in his commentary. Now, after three years, the shouting gets on my nerves. I understand if you are excited about a match. But if you’re howling with joy when Kings XI Punjab beat Deccan Chargers chasing 123 in 20 overs, I am sorry my friend, we know it’s fake.

We in India know what is fake. For years, we have used China mobiles. We have seen Tushar Kapoor beat up bad guys thrice his size, and we even watched a film where Fardeen Khan invents the world’s fastest car. We also have Rakhi Sawant. So when something is fake, we just know it.

3. Product Placement: Even though the IPL did not accept my suggestions a few years back of having fielding positions called Kohinoor Extra Cover and Anne French Fine Leg, the IPL has not stopped short of going the whole 22 yards when it comes to product placements. Citi moments of success still jolt us out of our sleep, Karbonn Kamaal catches win matches, and DLF maximums exist in every match.

Thankfully, the MRF Blimp, some marketing guru’s idea of a funny joke, has been done away with. But the product placements just go on. This year, we had Akshay Kumar with his moustache cheering for Ganguly’s team. He spoke passionately about Pune being his favourite team, which is funny, because two years back, he had said his heart beats for Delhi Daredevils. Change of heart? You bet!

 

4. Idea Ads: Times will change, people will be born and eventually die, Shakti Kapoor will proposition a young woman and then apologise, kingdoms will rise and then decline, but Idea will continue to make the crappiest ads on television. I badly want to meet the people who come up with those ideas. What exactly are their motives? Who do they research about? Who is their target audience? The All India Chacha Chaudhry Fans Association?

I mean, we understand that you want to promote the concept of ‘heavenly apps’? Does that mean you torture us with an ad a day, with Abhishek Bachan dressed in white, and a bunch of morons around him, on a set that looks stolen from the film ‘Thoda Pyar Thoda Magic?’ Are we really that dumb? The IPL is undoubtedly the time of the year where most companies come up with their best ads, as they are ensured a steady viewership over a month and a half. We have seen some of the finest sets of ads in the IPL. And then there’s this company, stubbornly sticking to Abhishek Bachhan, and testing out patience and mocking at our intelligence, year after year. How much longer?

 

5. Navjyot Singh Sidhu: But of course you guessed it. What do I say of the man? He has officially gone nuts.

The last time he was in the news, he picked a fight with a guard and blocked the road in Andhra Pradesh when he had come to attend a wedding. Before that, he told a co-commentator ”Don’t fuck with me” and was banned from the live commentary panel and restricted to the pre and post match discussions (the part of the match where you go out for a smoke, take a crap, come back, switch on the channel and say, “Abey, yeh kab tak bakega?”). This time, Sidhu was again in the pre and post match discussions, which shows that the IPL has some sort of viewer sensitivity. Every match that he sees, is the best innings he has seen in a long time. Every discussion includes one of his shayaris and allegories. This year, to spice things up for us, he started saying small one-liners just before the camera panned away at the end of the session. That little ‘chak de phatte‘, or ‘ghumade balla’ to make our day.

Himesh Reshammiya 2.0

I was surfing through the tripe that Times of India chooses to call news one of these days, when I read that an actress had signed out of a film that was being produced by Himesh Reshammiya. I was shocked. Himesh Reshammiya? A producer?? What had happened to the world?
Even though Himesh Reshammiyya is going through some bad times, I will not deny that I was a fan. I genuinely liked his songs in Aashiq Banaya Aapne, Aksar, and those other early films that he gave the music for.

Even though people laugh at him today, Himesh was the first and only cross-national singing superstar. Others had their own segments – Udit Narayan and Kumar Sanu on the rural market or Shaan/KK on the urban market. Himesh was the only artiste whose songs could be heard in the swankiest clubs and also the loudest autos. And though this survey wasn’t exactly done by Earnst & Young, his songs played in the background for almost all MMS clips that were made in India in the last few years. In the truest sense, the voice of our maddening nation. Himesh was the only rockstar to have existed in India.

It was hard to crack the formula that made his songs work. Was it the fast pace of all the songs? Was it the theme of the unfaithful girl, and the honest lover, a theme most Indian men like to live in? Or was it that someone who was not originally a star, had climbed the ladder and was splashed all over the television? No one really nose what the formula was, but it worked.

In an interview on Koffee with Karan, the lyricist Javed Akhtar had this interesting story to reveal about Himesh. When a lyricist wrote the lyrics for a song, Himesh asked him to leave the punchline for him to write. According to him, the punchline was the most catchy, and it is what makes a song.
If you look at his songs, you will realise that most of his songs have punchlines that are repeated, and have easy lyrics, which can be sung by one and all.

Aashiq banaya, aashiq banaya, aashiq banaya aapne.

Shakalaka lakalaka lakalaka lakalaka Shakalaka Boom Boom

I love you O Sayyonee, I love you O Sayyonee, I love you O Sayyonee, Koi Shaq? (What’s up?)

In interviews, Himesh revealed that he has a bank of about 3000 tunes with him, and all he needs to do is churn them out, and he would never run out of hits. “Ever morning when I brush my teeth, I compose a tune,” said the man.

However, Himesh was never able to crack the cream of the market. He made music for films starring Emraan Hashmi, Akshay Kumar, or himself. People like the Chopras, the Johars, the Akhtars, never used his music for their films.

When he himself came on Karan Johar’s show, he expressed his desire to create tunes for A-list films and stars. I was a little scared that he might be alienating his target audience.
As if on cue, Himesh went ahead and got himself a makeover.

Change, they say, is good. But why would you want to change something that works perfectly?

It was doomed from the beginning, I tell you, this makeover ka chakkar. All those who have seen the trailer of Bin Bulaye Baraati would agree with me that sometimes, you just know something is not going to work out when you see it for the first time.

And I’d blame the all-homogenising, all-encompassing nature of the ‘market’ for what was being done to Himesh.

Earlier, he was a rolly-polly, bearded guy. None of the six-pack bullshit that every other actor seems to have. Indians have paunches, they relate to people with paunches. Himesh was the guy who looked uncomfortable and jittery when he was in front of the camera, but once the song began, he was the Main Man. Capable of squeezing emotions out you didn’t know existed in the first place out of you. The bearly beard which invoked the animalistic emotions in one and all. Tears, blood and sweat went into each of the songs. And the cap.

Whose brainwave was it to ask him to get rid of the cap? Are you shitting me? Himesh without the cap is like Che Guevera without his eyes.

Suddenly, there was this suave Himesh Reshammiya on our TV screens. The transformation left him nowhere. Neither was he suave enough for the classes, nor recognisable enough for the masses. A deep connection was left a void vacuum.
His songs, which always had killer punchlines that were catchy and easy to remember, became a mish-mash of a million things, changed beyond recognition.

I think he was going through a dilemma, trying to please everyone. What’s cool for one will never be cool for the other. And anyway, the definition of cool is as vague as Wasim Akram’s commentary. However, there are a few broad pointers that can tell you if you are doing something cool or not. For Himesh’s benefit, I have chosen to present some of those below:

But now, enough is enough, Himesh. Here is something you should know.

If you fit into the conventional, you would be Nadeem-Shravan. We have others, you know.
If we wanted just romantic songs, there is Enrique, who has been constipating on top of the charts for a few years now. If we wanted party songs, there is a lot of bull coming in from this Pitbull fellow. If we wanted peppy Hindi numbers, there are a million music directors. What we truly need is gut-wrenching songs of pain.

Songs of betrayed lovers, and unrequited love, in a country with a sex ratio of 850/1000. We need someone to invoke our banal instincts, our innermost pains. We need you to be you.

To quote another guy who had long hair and sang a bit through his nose, “Come as you are. As you were. Ask I want you to be.”

IPL and the Shit by the Pool Theory

The recent sting operation by India TV exposed five cricketers who were caught asking for money to bowl no-balls. It’s not as if the earth stopped moving after watching the video (Skip the bullshit, the real action starts at 8:08)

Before anything else, let me make it clear that I don’t take sting operations very seriously. It’s a cheap trick to play, and there is no guarantee that the person is speaking the truth in the first place. Now, if you take Shakti Kapoor, who has spent 15 years of his life playing lecherous characters, get him drunk, and put a hot woman in front of him, obviously he’ll say that the entire industry engages in casting couch. What did they expect? He’ll say “Nahi, beti. Aise kaam nahi karte. Ghar jaake so jao!” ?? In fact, my respect grew for Shakti Kapoor because he didn’t pounce on the girl right away.

Now, if Shalabh Srivastav has to convince the ‘stinger’ to get some money, he has to act cool and nonchalant about it, saying that everyone does it. I am not saying that the IPL is clean as Chidambaram’s chit, just that you can’t take someone’s words seriously when they’re trying to impress someone else.

Looking back, have the owners made an ‘ass’ of themselves??

And also, the IPL was never known to be a fully transparent organisation. Since its inception, unlisted companies with shady backgrounds have been a part of it. Take for example the case of Modi’s kin having stakes in many of the franchises. Or the rules being bent for RCB to buy Chris Gayle in the middle of the 4th season, where he went on to slam his team into the finals. Or how the BCCI is the only organisation where politicians from every major political party work together for the betterment of the game. Or simply how Laxman Sivaramakrishnan is allowed to commentate when he clearly is less interesting than a Class 8 Chemistry teacher.

When the IPL became the money-spinning monster that it is now, many of the veteran sages of the game (Shastri, Gavaskar) had said that the league would primarily benefit domestic players. One cannot deny that salaries have shot up. While a domestic player would earn 450 rupees per day in the 90s, he earns 35,000 per day of a domestic test match. Compare that to the $4.13 billion it earns (figures of 2010) yearly, and it is chickenfeed. The BCCI shares 26% of its profits with the players, the major chunk of it goes to its bigger stars.

Now, to come to the Shit by the Pool theory. Suppose you went to swim in a pool. After a lap, you stop to take rest and notice that there is some pigeon droppings by the side of the pool. Do you feel happy that the shit is not inside the pool you’re swimming in? Or would you assume that there might be lots of shit in the pool too?

Everyone knows that the IPL is a murky field. If India TV wanted to do some serious journalism, they should have asked how people like Vilasrao Deshmukh and Arun Jaitley have such a strong hold over the BCCI? How can the owner of one of the teams be the President of the BCCI? Why does the BCCI not open its accounts for scrutiny under the RTI? Give us that, and then we’ll bother. What’s the point of faaltu mein ruining the careers of five players we haven’t even heard of?

Slowly but surely, this news will pass. Sidhu will say something like “Oye, Guru! Pride is like an underwear. Once there are holes, you cannot wear it.” The Sports Minister will make a little fuss about it. India TV will play the video till the 2014 General Elections.

By the way, aaj kiska match hai?

Castles in the Air India

For the shitty condition that Air India is in at the moment, not many would know that it has a unique history. It all began in 1932 with JRD Tata flying a plane from Karachi to Bombay. Called Tata Airlines, the whole company consisted of two planes, a pilot, and two mechanics.

After Independance, the Indian government bought a majority stake in the Airlines, and it became Air India. By then, JRD should have said Tata to all his dreams of a world-class airliner. The condition it is in, and the reasons for it being in the news these days, are tragic to the extent of being comical.

In April 2007, Air India hired 186 foreign pilots. There are only 36 of them left, and one of them left because he one day walked into the cockpit, to find that the pilots had put newspapers on the windows to block extra light from coming into the cockpit. In February this year, a senior ‘flight inspector’ was suspended for being drunk while on duty. In 2010, one of the pilots was going to the washroom and left the plane in the hands of the co-pilot. While adjusting his seat, the co-pilot knocked off the controls, and the plane sank 7000 feet into the ground, and then was rescued by the pilot.

Here’s the bit that is not funny. In May 2010, a plane crashed in Mangalore, killing 158 people. Since the 2007 merger between Air India and Indian Airlines, it has been a Godawful mess. While airlines have been taking a beating worldwide, Air India is suffering from its worst phase in its 79 year old history. Losses of more than 7,000 crores expected in this year, strikes by pilots causing losses of 100 crores a week, more than 100 flights – most of them international routes – grounded due to the issues not being sorted out. That’s why I laughed when Vijay Mallya asked the government to bail out Kingfisher Airlines. The government can’t manage their own airlines. Ghanta, they’ll bail you out, brada!

The common logic that everything the government owns by default sucks, is not always true. Airlines of other countries, take Singapore Airlines, is among the best in the world. When Indonesia’s state controlled airlines, ‘Garuda’ was in a deep mess, experts from the aviation industry were called in to stem the rot. But then, this is India, man. Who gives a fuck?

In an industry where customer service is of prime importance and customer is king, the mascot of Air India himself is called Maharaja! When Gustav Baldauf, an Austrian with 25 years was made the Chief Operating Officer of the sick airlines, many eyebrows were raised. In an interview to a newspaper, he complained against too much government interference, and within months, he was served a notice for ‘indiscipline’ and fired. His crime? He had suggested that industry professionals be given top positions to revive the fortunes of the airlines.

In the present system, the Airlines is headed by an officer from the Indian Administrative Service. It baffles me how someone who has cleared an examination could be at the helm of a company that requires decades of experience. To top it all, the airline is a victim to our touring mantris. Like our Honourable President, who spent a cool 205 crores on foreign tours. When criticised for taking her family and relatives on the tours, Ms. Patil said that it is the ‘duty of all the citizens to respect the post of the President.’

Which brings us to the important question, does the government still need to run a state-controlled airline in today’s age? In an interview with Karan Thapar last week, the Aviation Minister Ajit Singh himself agreed that the age of state owned airlines is gone. Immediately after that, in the unfathomable way that only a minister can speak, he ruled out any chance of privatisation of the company.

According to an article by Tehelka, the percentage of Indians who use airlines is 2%. 50% of Indian air traffic is between Mumbai and Delhi. It is not as if the whole country is going to choke and die if the government deregulates the airlines.

Why then, is there this stubbornness to consider privatisation? Unless some drastic steps are taken, the airline is going to bleed itself to death anyway. What is the point of a bailout, where the government has to work to pay off the 40,000 crores of debt that the airline is reeling under? In a country where basics like education, healthcare, and infrastructure are in a pitiable condition, what is the need to pump so much money into a company, that has only a 17% market share in the industry, which is used by less than 2% of the country’s population?

The telecom industry has shown that privatisation in the Indian markets is not necessarily a bad thing, as the Indian consumer is always looking for better services at cheaper prices. But then, there is always the question of the babu. The babu flies in the Air India. How will the babu take any steps against it?

The Maharaja meanwhile, much like the airline, continues to stand with his hand on his chest, and his head bowed. Ready to serve. Ready to bow.

Thoughts on ‘Satyameva Jayate’

I have never been able to figure Aamir Khan out. One of the other Khan is a money-making machine, and the other is busy being human by killing blackbucks, running over people on the streets, and getting into catfights in the industry.

But Aamir Khan has always been a puzzle. Is he really what he is cranked up to be – a sensitive star, a star with a heart and a brain? Or is it just part of a carefully created image that he painstakingly etches out for himself ? In any case, I have no problems with the films he makes.

When I heard that he has spent 7 crores on the promotion of the TV show Satyameva Jayate, I smiled. A cynical, intellectual smile that hides more than it reveals. I was waiting for the first episode so that I could rip it to shreds and put up a funny post on my blog. I am highly skeptical of people who try to change the country through mass movements.

It’s been a week now, and I can’t think of much to criticise. I watched with a cynical eye, waiting to pounce on anything that I didn’t agree with. I was expecting a sentimental, sensational, tearjerker of a show with lots of slow motion and background music.

Thankfully, I was disappointed. The show is a well-researched show that relies on more than just publicity and the existence of a star as a host to drive home the point. It is also an honest show, and does not resort to gimmickry and manipulation of emotions.

Take the first episode for example. The shot of the boys who did not have any girls to marry was an outstanding point to show the repercussions of what will happen if female foeticide continues at current rates. Dispelling the myth that it is a problem in rural India was another clincher. Over all, it was a show that relied on facts, different perspectives, and knew exactly where to draw the line.

The best part was that the solutions he provided were democratic, fully plausible solutions that could actually do something about the problem. Khan also says that all of us should personally avoid killing a girl child. My main grudge against the Anna Hazare movement was that it was led by a man who has no idea of how things work in a democracy. “Abhishek Singhvi should be hanged if found guilty”. Kyun, bhai? On what grounds?? And no one spoke about how all of us pay off a cop on the road to escape a fine. A nation is its people. If the people do not change, what are you trying to change?

The fact that the show has been dubbed into various languages and is being aired on Doordarshan is commendable. I doubt anyone has had the balls to do something like that earlier.

There will always be critics. Like this intellectual who had problems with the fact that Coke and Reliance were sponsors for the show. One has to understand that a TV programme is a commercial product at the end of the day. The maximum that Khan could do was to request the companies not to feature ads with him, as that would dilute the message of the programme. How does one really have any control over what the advertisers say?

He also says that Khan shouldn’t have called one of the victims on to the show as she was a Muslim and this would give right-wing organisations further points to diss the minorities. For a secular nation, it is ironic that we cannot discuss a single topic without bringing religion into the picture. What a shame!

Then there are those who say that Aamir Khan is paid 3 crores per episode. He should donate that amount first. This is exactly the kind of thing I’d imagine Anna Hazare saying. Are you shitting me? SRK was paid 2.5 crores for hosting a show where people slip and fall into water. Hrithik Roshan was paid 3 crores per episode for a show where people dance to choreographed songs. If he has produced the show, he has the right to take the amount he deems fit, man. What the huge, fucking deal? And how profitable do you think it is to air something on Doordarshan? Or dub it into regional languages??

There will always be critics, picking holes and constructing theories. And then there will be those brainless Smart Alecs who claim on Facebook that they haven’t watched the show and somehow feel proud of it. Ignore them.

The show will not change the country. It will not end problems with a magic wand. If anything, it will increase your awareness about some issues in the country.

And for me, that’s a start.

Chicken Soup for the World

I have always thought about it, and if I am unable to publish anything in the next ten years, I will start writing self-help, motivational books.

They are the easiest to write – take some quotes, add some anecdotes, mix it all together with some sloppiness, and serve it four times the price it deserves. You have an instant success.

Since we were banned from reading novels in our school, the only books we could resort to were self-help books. So while my counterparts across the globe were reading about Asterix and Tintin, I was reading Norman Vincent Peale’s pearls of wisdom to the world.

‘How to Win Friends and Influence People’, ‘How to Stop Worrying and Start Living’, ‘How to Leave the Toilet without Flushing’, you name it, I had read it. For a while, I tried to follow some of the guidelines in the book. Like, one of the ‘secrets’ that Carnegie graciously revealed to the world was this – ‘Read a good book on the sexual side of marriage’. I felt like telling him that if I was allowed to read a good book on the sexual side of even hippopotamuses, I would have stopped reading his crappy book in the first place.

Somewhere along the line, came the Chicken Soup for the Soul books. They were easier on the brain than the other monologues about the secrets to a good life. A collection of 101 stories contributed by readers who spoke about their experiences. Cute.

Then came Part 2. And then 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. And then they started catering to niche audiences – Father’s soul, Teenager’s soul, Mother’s soul, Pet Lover’s soul. And you’d think that since there are more than 200 books, they’d start pricing them cheaper, but no. All the books are 300 rupees. I wonder who even buys them!

I thought since there are so many Chicken Soup books, and all of them are so moralising about the lives of people in the mainstream – fathers, teachers, pet lovers etc. What about the unspoken voices? What about that loser you see on the street who lines up in front of the wine shop at 9 AM and lies down in front of the shop by 10 AM? Doesn’t he deserve a Chicken Soup for his soul? Don’t assholes have souls??

So, on behalf of all the unspoken people in the world, I suggest the franchise comes up with some more titles so that the whole world can sit together and read.

I mean, in the end, can’t we all just solve our problems by reading some Chicken Soup for the Soul?

So, here are my contributions..

Does anyone know how I can get through to some publishers?

Sachin and Gandhi : The Bringing Down of an Icon

When Sachin Tendulkar struck his long awaited 100^th century about a month ago in Bangladesh, the nation was supposed to celebrate. He was after all, the darling of the country, someone who has been followed wherever he went for the last two decades, an idol, a role model, even a god. And this was a feat that was never thought achievable in the history of the game, and doesn’t look like it can be broken by anyone else. It was but expected that the nation would go into a frenzy.

The national media did their bit : feature stories describing milestones in his long career, TV channels churned out their bulletins with Jai Ho playing in the background. But on websites like cricinfo.com and youtube.com, there was an outpouring of hatred by fans. Many called Sachin Tendulkar selfish, others said he was playing for records, and that he needs to hang up his boots.

Not once did anyone say that he didn’t look fit on the field, no one spoke about him unable to run, or his eyes and hand-eye coordination getting worse, or anything else related to cricket. The argument was that he was selfish and needed to be dropped.

It was then that I could see a clear reflection of my thoughts a few years back. I was out of my spiritual boarding school. I felt like a free bird, and a rebel. I remember having strong hatred for Gandhi back then. I could attribute some of it to the simultaneous release of three films on Bhagat Singh, but there was more to it than just the release of the films.

I didn’t know enough about Gandhi – just that he was a freedom fighter, and whatever else our books and teachers in school told us about him. There were a few others from our class as well, and we regularly sat together and spoke about Gandhi, along the lines of how he was responsible for all the problems in our country.

Much later, when I read more about him, I learnt that Gandhi was more than just a freedom fighter. And I also realised that most of the opinions I had harboured about him were wrong in the first place. What then, prompted me to hate him so much? I have asked myself this many times, and this is the closest I have come to as an answer.

Throughout our childhoods, we are surrounded by Gandhi, his principles, his photos, his teachings, his songs, his stories, and films on him. We had a subject called Human Values and books by Gandhi were used as our course material. This ubiquity, after a point, felt suffocating. And to be able to criticise Gandhi seemed like an act of rebellion for me. I did not understand him enough, so I went ahead and made my own opinions, often basing them on things my friends (who were equally, if not more ignorant) told me. Through some twisted logic, we believed that Gandhi was responsible for the partition, and that he was a propagator of Hindutva.

I have made my peace with Gandhi today. I have learnt to dissect his public from his private life, and have learnt to look at things with a broader perspective. But when I see criticism of Sachin Tendulkar, I can’t help feel that he has reached the same stage as an icon.

The most common criticism about him is that when he scores a century, India loses the match. This fact automatically translates to him being a selfish player who is intent on achieving personal milestones. This could not be further away from the truth.

The nature of the game of cricket itself means that individual performances are not as crucial to a side’s fortunes, as it is with other games. Take football, for example, where a goal by a single player could tilt the match totally in the favour of the team, thus critically affecting the match. In cricket, batting is just one aspect of the game. A century by no means implies that the team is going to win the match, because the game is divided into two halves – batting and bowling – and each of the aspects affect the match equally.

To further illustrate my point, let me give you the example of the match between South Africa and Australia in the March 2006. Australia batted first and scored 434, the highest score ever in a One Day International, and the first time any team had crossed 400 runs in 50 overs. Australia, however, lost the match at the end of the day because South Africa was able to score 438, thanks to the shoddy bowling by the Australians.

There have been umpteen such examples where individual performances did not result in the team winning the match, and this by no means implies that the performances weren’t good enough, it just means that the other aspect of the game wasn’t good enough on the day. That it happens with surprising regularity with Sachin is a reflection of our universally acknowledged poor bowling skills, and not because his centuries are not good enough.

Here, let me take you back a little into the past again. This was in the same phase when I was vehemently against Gandhi, circa 2005. Sachin Tendulkar at that time had been struggling for a year or so to score his 35^th Test century, one that would result in him beating Sunil Gavaskar’s then highest 34. He was suffering from recurring back injuries, tennis elbow, and seemed nervous and edgy in the crease. I was among the many that rooted for his retirement from the game.

I remember the day he scored the century, this is what he said to the media – “Landmarks happen. You just go and bat because you want to bat well and get runs for your team. If you chase landmarks then it becomes a problem.” He made it clear that the fans had been demanding the century for a long time, and that it was quite stressful. I remember reading it with cynicism.

However, if I look back at the incident now, I realise he knew what he was talking about. If he had retired then, we wouldn’t have witnessed some of the greatest knocks in the history of the game. He went on to make a spectacular comeback, a resurrection that culminated with him becoming Player of the year in 2010. We wouldn’t have seen his knock of 200, or his crucial role in the World Cup last year.

It is actually a matter of great credit to Sachin Tendulkar that no one is talking about the way he is playing his cricket, how he is running between the wickets, or his fitness. The criticism is always generic – that new blood needs to be infused into the team, and that it is high time he retired. From my experience seven years ago, I know that the decision to retire is best left to Sachin himself.

With the ruckus about him becoming an MP, I can see a clear link between my criticism of Gandhi back then, and the criticism Sachin faces today. It is not to do with him as a cricketer. It has got more to do with the rebellion involved in the bringing down of an icon.